I saw the "mode" option of the calculator thinking that there was something wrong via the setting however everything was fine. I don"t mind manually converting the scientific notation into decimal create but I"d really choose for the value to be already in decimal create given the workfill of these difficulties.

Thank you for reading!

**Note**: I have a TI-84 Plus Silver Edition.

You watching: Ti-84 convert to scientific notation

calculator

Share

Cite

Follow

edited Nov 6 "17 at 5:11

Misha Lavrov

94k1010 gold badges8888 silver badges158158 bronze badges

asked Nov 6 "17 at 3:54

Delight NathDelight Nath

2111 gold badge11 silver badge22 bronze badges

$endgroup$

2

Add a comment |

## 2 Answers 2

Active Oldest Votes

2

$egingroup$

The calculator immediately uses scientific notation for numbers smaller than $0.001$ in absolute worth, no issue what your mode settings are; this cannot be overridden.

The the majority of straightforward means to get the calculator to instantly tell you how many type of zeroes tbelow are after the decimal, in such a instance, is to include $1$:

0.17^4 8.3521e-4Ans+1 1.00083521Just disregard the $1$ in front of the decimal point and also you have actually the answer you want.

Note that in general, this will certainly shed you precision:

0.17^8 6.975757441e-7Ans+1 1.000000698In this case, it"s not as well bad: we deserve to use the second output to count zeroes and the first for even more digits. Sometimes, it will certainly shed you *all* of the precision:

0.17^16 4.86611919e-13Ans+1 1But in this last instance, maybe you don"t want the number as a decimal after all.

See more: ‘ Image May Contain: Plant, Outdoor And Nature And Water, Facebook Analyses And Tags Pictures

Share

Cite

Follow

edited Nov 6 "17 at 5:10

answered Nov 6 "17 at 4:56

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

94k1010 gold badges8888 silver badges158158 bronze badges

$endgroup$

2

Add a comment |

0

$egingroup$

Scientific notation have the right to represent specific numbers if they are terminating decimals. In your case $0.17^4=0.00083521=8.3521E-04$ exactly. Did you drop the final $1$? I would mean the calculator to show it. The calculator most likely does this calculation as $e^4 log 0.17$ and also $log 0.17$ cannot be represented precisely, so there is a reasonable chance that the result is not precise. I wouldn"t suppose that to adjust anypoint as far forward as the fifth area, yet seeing $8.35209999E-04$ would not surpclimb me

Share

Cite

Follow

answered Nov 6 "17 at 4:45

Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

356k2626 gold badges234234 silver badges423423 bronze badges

$endgroup$

1

Add a comment |

## Your Answer

Thanks for contributing a response to kaupunkiopas.comematics Stack Exchange!

Please be certain to*answer the question*. Provide details and share your research!

But *avoid* …

Use kaupunkiopas.comJax to format equations. kaupunkiopas.comJax recommendation.

To learn even more, see our tips on composing great answers.

Draft saved

Draft discarded

### Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google

Sign up utilizing Facebook

Sign up making use of Email and Password

Submit

### Post as a guest

Name

Email Required, yet never shown

### Blog post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Article Your Answer Discard

By clicking “Article Your Answer”, you agree to our regards to company, privacy plan and cookie plan

## Not the answer you're looking for? Browse various other inquiries tagged calculator or ask your own question.

Featured on Meta

Related

24

“Why execute I always gain 1 once I keep hitting the square root switch on my calculator?”

5

When the denominator is bigger than the numerator, why does the modulo equal the numerator?

1

TI83+. kaupunkiopas.com-> Solver. Why does it give different solutions?

0

Why carry out I acquire the Fibonacci sequence once I start with 1 and keep utilizing the + sign?

0

I have an error as soon as calculating “locations under a graph”

1

Why does my calculator offer weird answers for particular problems including complex numbers?

3

Why does Desmos offer a various exponential regression than my TI 84 and my Calculus text?

14

Why is the maximum value of my calculator $10^100$?

1

Why doesn't my Ti-84 simplify fractions

Hot Netoccupational Questions even more warm inquiries

Concern feed

Subscribe to RSS

Question feed To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and also paste this URL into your RSS reader.

kaupunkiopas.comematics

Company

Stack Exreadjust Netoccupational

site architecture / logo design © 2021 Stack Exadjust Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. rev2021.8.5.39930

kaupunkiopas.comematics Stack Exadjust functions ideal via JavaScript allowed

Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exreadjust deserve to store cookies on your gadget and also disclose indevelopment in accordance via our Cookie Policy.